PRESS RELEASE FROM THE OFFICE OF PHILIP DAVIES
OPEN PRISONS
December 16, 2014
A government minister last night appeared to signal a shift in policy saying victims should be consulted before a prisoner moves to an open prison – after months of lobbying from a district MP.
Shipley MP Philip Davies has long campaigned that victims of crime should be consulted on whether a move from a higher category prison was appropriate.
And speaking in Commons Justice Questions Justice Minister Mike Penning appeared to agree with him.
Mr Penning said: “It is important that victims are informed at each stage of the pathway, from when they report the crime to when the offender is released from prison. They should not have a veto, but they should be consulted.”
Mr Davies said he was “delighted” with the minister’s response.
“I think victims are spoken to in some cases but certainly not all,” he said.
“I will now be asking Parliamentary questions to find out how many victims have been contacted about their offender being downgraded. Mr Penning was quite clear what he said in the Commons and he is a minister in the department and therefore we expect to see this happen.
“At the moment victims are not getting enough say and we are allowing serious offenders to live a cushy life in open prisons. Most people assume open prisons would be for the most minor of offences but this is not the case.”
Previous parliamentary questions by Mr Davies showed more than 300 murderers were in open prisons last year.
Ends
---
SPENDING ON INTERNATIONAL AID
Date: December 5, 2014
An attempt by an MP to give the public a referendum on whether they want spending on International Aid to be set in stone and protected from future cuts has failed.
The International Aid Bill will make it law that at least 0.7 per cent of national income is spent on aid.
But Shipley MP Philip Davies argued at a time when all other departments were seeing their spending reduced, it was not acceptable to ring fence international aid but not health or education.
He told MPs the Office of Budget Responsibility published figures this week which showed spending as a proportion of GDP will go down, health, defence and schools and education.
Mr Davies said: “It is quite extraordinary that today I suspect that the majority of my constituents would want to protect the health budget, but we are here rubber stamping in effect that every other government department spending will go down as a proportion of GDP but the only one we should make sure stays the same is overseas aid. I cannot accept that this is the will of the British public.
“Let’s have some democratic legitimacy for this policy and have a referendum and let’s see what they want their taxes spent on.”
Instead he wanted Britain to spent 0.35 per cent in line with other rich countries, increasing to the 0.7 per cent level if the public wanted it.
And he said an independent body was needed to scrutinise where the money was going as many of feared overseas aid was “taking of money from poor people in rich countries and giving it to rich people in poor countries”
Mr Davies added: “What they see is millions of pounds being siphoned off by dictators around the world for a new fleet of Mercedes or whatever it may be and think the Government may as well include a Mercedes catalogue with the aid they are giving these countries. These are the legitimate concerns that many of my constituents have.”
“Those will only be enhanced when they realise that the two main parties have removed from the Bill any provision to make sure the money is spent effectively, wisely and for the good of the people it is meant to help.”
Mr Davies said: “This Bill has very little public support. Overseas does not work, we have been pouring billions and billions of pounds into countries in Africa that are no further on than when we started pouring money in, which would demonstrate it is not very effective.
“International aid is also entrenching welfare dependency on a grand scale. We will have to always find billions of pounds to hit an arbitrary target of 0.7 which we are putting into law. This is one way street. It is a minimum amount.”
If aid was bring spent correctly the legislation could expire after five years as the money would no longer be needed.
Money spent on benefits of foreigners or UK citizens living abroad should also be included in the 0.7 per cent spend. He raised concerns about countries currently in receipt of overseas aid joining the EU as the UK would then need to spend on raising the standards in the particular country, and then would also spend the international aid on another country “in effect spending the money twice.”
